I think there are two customer journeys, and most teams only look at one.
1) The journey the customer actually takes
Messy, quite non-linear, different for every person. Influenced by search, social, timing, emotion, pressure, and life.
2) The journey the business thinks it’s nurturing
The emails you send, the automations you built, the stages you designed on a whiteboard.
Customer journey mapping becomes useful when you stop trying to force #1 into neat stages and instead understand how #2 supports (or fights) reality.
Where email fits is here:
→ how people find you
→ how trust is built
→ how quickly (or slowly) someone moves to action
And the fastest gap I see, every single time? Teams don’t test their own journey.
Seriously, right now go:
→ sign up
→ download
→ follow
→ purchase
→ wait
→ experience what actually arrives in the inbox, and in what order
Over weeks and months, not days
If you want a simple place to start, do this:
Map just four stages - no more.
You can use different labels, but the idea holds for B2B and B2C:
Then, at each stage, apply TFDS:
→ What are they Thinking?
→ What are they Feeling?
→ What are they Doing?
→ What are they Saying?
This is where email earns its place!
If your emails don’t match the thinking and emotional state of the stage someone is in, relevance breaks - even if the content is “good”.
You don’t need a perfect map - that doesn't exist.