There is a very quiet shift happening in email marketing that most teams have not clocked yet, partly because it does not look like a “new feature” or a shiny tactic.
It looks boring, but it's what we all do:
Searching in the inbox.
And yet, once you really understand how email is used in the real world, not how marketers wish it was used, it becomes obvious that this shift has been inevitable for a long time.
I am calling it Search Inbox Optimisation (SIO).
Not SEO.
Not “SEO for email”.
And the reason it matters now is not that inbox search is new, but because inbox providers are finally formalising and accelerating behaviour that already exists — particularly with AI layered into the inbox experience.
Email has been badly misframed for YEARS!
Somewhere along the way, marketing teams were pushed to treat email like a performance channel — something that should behave like paid media or social content. Immediate opens. Immediate clicks. Immediate attribution.
But this framing does not match how email exists in people’s lives.
Email exists because it has to.
In personal life, you use email to:It becomes a long term archive of interactions and obligations.
At work, email becomes even more critical.
It is the backbone of professional communication. Tasks arrive by email, decisions are documented by email. Information is stored and referenced via email. Even teams that claim to “hate email” still rely on it as the system of record.
This tells us something important:
Email is not primarily a content channel.
Email is a utility.
And people behave very differently in utility environments than they do in entertainment or discovery environments.
A task environment is a place people enter with intent.
They are not browsing for fun (and if they are we must question how they spend their free time), they are not passively consuming and they are not “discovering” things the way they might on social platforms.
They are trying to do something.
In B2B, that usually means:Learning still exists here — but learning is still a task. It is tied to achievement.
In B2C or D2C contexts, the behaviours look different on the surface but the intent is similar:In both cases, the inbox is not a feed. It is a decision and retrieval environment.
This is the single most important context for understanding SIO.
Most email reporting assumes that value is created at the moment of send.
We send the email.
We watch the opens
We watch the clicks
We make a judgment
We move on
But this assumes that people either engage now or never.
That assumption is wrong, so very wrong. In reality, many people do not open emails when they arrive because:
So they do what humans have always done in task environments.
They defer it.
They leave the email unread, they delete it, they mentally register it, they file it away, they may come back later.
If you spend time inside ESP data — not just campaign dashboards, but long range engagement views — you will often see opens happening weeks, months, or even a year after send.
That is not accidental, that is inbox search in action.
People have searched their inboxes for as long as email has existed.
What has changed is scale. Inbox volumes are higher than ever. Unread counts are overwhelming. Manual organisation no longer works for most people. So search becomes the safety mechanism.
A grounding stat that matters here: around 40% of consumers have more than 50 unread emails, with many sitting in the hundreds or thousands.
In work inboxes, that number is often far higher, search is how people cope with overload, but inbox search does not behave like Google.
When someone searches Google, they are often looking for something new. When someone searches their inbox, they are usually trying to retrieve something they already believe exists.
They search for:This is recognition based behaviour.
“I know I saw this.”
“I know who would have emailed me about this.”
“I know this exists somewhere.”
This is why calling this “SEO for email” is misleading.
Email is not a search engine; it will never be one. Inbox search is not about ranking, people are not discovering unknown brands via inbox search.
They are retrieving known ones!
That is why Search Inbox Optimisation (SIO) is a better frame.
SIO is not about keywords in the SEO sense.
It is about:This requires designing emails for later usefulness, not just immediate attention.
There is a widespread practice that quietly destroys inbox searchability: all-image emails. Design-led teams often build emails in Figma or Canva, export them as images, and drop them into the ESP. Visually, they look polished. Brand teams love them. Functionally, they are deeply flawed.
Inbox search relies on live text in the HTML. Images cannot be indexed in the same way. If your email contains no meaningful live copy, it cannot be properly searched later.
Some teams argue that alt text solves this problem. It does not. Alt text exists for accessibility — specifically for screen readers. It is meant to be read aloud, not used as a search index. Overloading alt text with keywords breaks accessibility and still does not solve retrieval.
If an email cannot be meaningfully read as text, it cannot be meaningfully found.
That means it only exists at the moment it is sent. Which completely contradicts how people actually use their inbox.
Modern inboxes like Gmail and Outlook continuously index emails in the background.
They index:This allows users to retrieve messages instantly across thousands of emails.
The important thing here is keyword matching, but again, not in the SEO sense.
Inbox keywords are memory cues.
People do not search their inbox like this:
“best email marketing strategy 2026”
They search like this:
“Beth O’Malley”
“email marketing”
“RE:markable”
OR
“pricing”
“invoice”
“newsletter”
Because they already know:
This makes consistency critical.
If your sender name changes constantly, if your subject lines are vague, or if your messaging jumps between unrelated topics, you make yourself harder to retrieve later.
SIO is not about stuffing keywords into emails.
It is about reinforcing the same mental associations over time so that when the problem appears, you are the obvious thing to search for.
Inbox providers are now accelerating search and retrieval with AI.
Google is rolling out Gemini-powered features across Workspace and Gmail, including:
Gmail is becoming an AI-mediated interface. The inbox is no longer just a list of messages. It is a layer that interprets and surfaces information on the user’s behalf.
This does not radically change human behaviour overnight. People were already searching. AI simply removes friction and increases efficiency.
But it raises the bar.
Emails that are vague, repetitive, or poorly structured become harder for AI to interpret. Emails that clearly state what they are about, who they are from, and why they matter are easier to summarise, prioritise, and surface.
AI will not reward cleverness EVER, it will only reward clarity.
Search Inbox Optimisation is the practice of designing emails so they can be easily found, recognised, and reused when someone needs them.
It is not a growth hack
It is not a copy trick
It is not a replacement for strategy
It is an acknowledgement of reality.
If you want to design for inbox search — now and in the future — this is where to focus:
SIO does not make emails suddenly perform better, it makes it more useful.
And usefulness is what survives in utility environments. As inboxes become more crowded and more intelligent, the programmes that win will not be the ones trying hardest to interrupt.
They will be the ones people deliberately go looking for — because they know the information is there, and they trust it will help.
That is what Search Inbox Optimisation is really about.
RE:markable is the weekly email about emails. Dropping the latest email marketing news, updates, insights, free resources, upcoming masterclasses, webinars, and of course, a little inbox mischief.